The review is prepared in one screen, the decisions become a development plan with dates, and the next review starts where this one ended. Your cycle stays where it lives; Juno makes it move between reviews.
The decisions are in a form nobody reopens, the development goal has no steps, and the next review starts from a blank page.
How it works
1Trigger & Signal
2Knowledge Design
Your LLM + Juno MCP
3Delivery & Adoption
4Measure
Whose plan has moved since the last reviewI have Noa's review on Thursday. Prepare it, and afterwards turn what we decide into her plan.
Communication · Individual contributor
Goals, skills, competencies and profile for one person, before you sit down.
Her self-assessment and your evaluation, side by side on the same competencies.
Every competency has level descriptions, one set for individual contributors, one for managers.
Current and target levels show how far she is from what her position expects.
My Goals
Own the architecture decisions
Completed 1 / 3 Steps
What you agreed becomes a goal with an end date and action items.
Juno suggests goals from her position and competencies; the two of you choose.
Each action item is a course, a task or a link, tracked on its own.
Invite a mentor onto the goal; they accept or decline, then follow it.
ThuOct 1
Noa and her manager
Oct 9
Step 1 · Learn
Oct 27
Reminder to Noa
Week 6Nov 13
Check at week 6
Next reviewJan 8
Read a second time
Juno reminds her before each date and tells you when a step is done.
The next conversation starts on her goal and what moved, not a blank page.
Her self-assessment and your evaluation again, beside the last ones, with their dates.
One view per manager: who finished, who's overdue, and one suggested nudge.
Your AI asks you
Which managers or teams, which numbers matter, the period, anything from outside Juno
I want a learning digest for every manager: who on their team finished what, who’s overdue, and one thing to follow up on. Use the Juno Journey connector for anything in Juno. If it isn’t connected, stop and tell me how to add it (https://docs.junojourney.com/mcp/overview). Before you build anything, ask me: 1. Which managers or departments to include 2. Which numbers matter (completions, overdue, scores, time spent) 3. The period it covers (e.g. the last 7 days) 4. Whether to add anything from outside Juno, and from where Ask these in one message, then wait for my answers. Check anything outside Juno is connected in this chat; if not, I’ll upload an export. If you can’t read completions here (analytics may be off for our account), I’ll upload an export from Juno. Never fill in numbers you can’t read. Build an interactive artifact: one view per manager with their team’s progress, overdue items and a suggested nudge. State definitions, data gaps and counts. Show me a sample for one manager first. Nothing runs on a schedule; tell me how to refresh it. Don’t send it to anyone or notify learners.
Teams down the side, topics across the top, so the gaps show up before the deadline does.
Your AI asks you
Which groups and topics, which courses count, what "done" means, the date range
I want a completion heatmap: groups down the side, topics across the top, and each cell showing how far along that group is. Use the Juno Journey connector for anything in Juno. If it isn’t connected, stop and tell me how to add it (https://docs.junojourney.com/mcp/overview). Before you build anything, ask me: 1. Which groups (departments, roles, locations) 2. Which topics, and which courses count for each 3. What “done” means (completed, passed, above a score) 4. The date range Ask these in one message, then wait for my answers. Pull everything you can from Juno; if you can’t read completions here (analytics may be off for our account), I’ll upload an export from Juno. If a grouping lives outside Juno (e.g. an HR system, if we use one), check it’s connected in this chat; if not, I’ll upload a CSV. Never guess anyone’s group. Confirm definitions with me, then build an interactive artifact: the heatmap with counts per cell, a click-through to the people in each cell, and the three weakest spots with suggested next steps. State definitions, show sample sizes, and grey out cells too small to judge. Don’t assign or notify anyone.
A shortlist of current courses and videos, one-line reason each. You pick what goes in.
Your AI asks you
The topic and audience, their level, languages, free or paid, any libraries you pay for
I want a topic channel in Juno Journey filled with the best external content, so we don’t rebuild what already exists. Use the Juno Journey connector for anything in Juno. If it isn’t connected, stop and tell me how to add it (https://docs.junojourney.com/mcp/overview). Before you build anything, ask me: 1. The topic and who it’s for 2. Their level (beginner, practitioner, expert) 3. Which languages we need 4. Free only or paid too, and any content libraries we already pay for Ask these in one message, then wait for my answers. Search Juno first for internal courses on this topic; ours come first. Then find external courses, videos and articles and check each is current. Give me a shortlist in 3-5 topics, with a one-line reason and publish date per pick. Only suggest links you actually found. If a library we pay for isn’t connected in this chat, say so; I’ll connect it or paste links from it. After I approve items, create a new private channel with those topics, add only those, and preview it. Adding content to a channel with members notifies them, so ask before touching an existing one. Don’t notify anyone until I say so.
The share of your people whose plan has moved since the last review
4 of 6
“What truly makes a difference is that we have been able to design personal and professional development plans aligned with our business needs.”
